Initiated Ordinance 309 on Denver’s ballot would ban slaughterhouses in the city. There is only one such facility operating in Denver currently — and it accounts for up to 20% of the United States’ lamb processing capacity.
The initiative is spearheaded by a group called Pro-Animal Future, which also placed a fur ban on Denver’s ballot in the Nov. 5 election. If it passes, it would directly impact Superior Farms’ Lamb Slaughter and Processing Facility on North Clarkson Street, just west of the South Platte River in Globeville.
The facility is roughly 70 years old. It has 160 workers who are predominantly Latinos, according to Ian Silverii, a Democratic consultant who’s the spokesman for the campaign to defeat the initiative.
What would 309 do if passed?
The initiative would prohibit the construction, maintenance or use of any slaughterhouses in Denver. It would take affect on Jan. 1, 2026, requiring the Superior Farms facility to move or shut down.
The initiative would require the city to “prioritize residents whose employment is affected by the ordinance in workforce training or employment assistance programs.”
What would be the broader impact?
Researchers at Colorado State University explored three scenarios for potential economic fallout if the ban passes. The best-case scenario was that 80% of lost economic activity would shift elsewhere in Colorado. The state’s economy would shed just under 700 jobs and a little over $215 million of economic activity.
Related Articles
Election |
A Denver woman’s home caught fire during a SWAT standoff with her son. Now the city will pay for the damage.
Election |
Land near 40th and Colorado rail station rezoned for big housing projects despite lingering concerns
Election |
Denver approves $125,000 settlement with man over wrongful arrest claim in auto theft case
Election |
Denver voters face two tax increase questions. Will they support both housing and the city’s safety-net hospital?
Election |
Denver launches one-stop website for residents to learn if they qualify for programs, discounts
In a worst-case scenario, Colorado could lose 2,787 jobs and $861 million in economic activity, according to the report. When Pro-Animal Future asked an expert from the University of Colorado Denver to review the CSU report, he questioned some of the findings.
What do supporters say?
Supporters see the initiative as a necessary step to reduce Denver’s participation in the slaughterhouse industry, which they say mistreats animals, has a detrimental impact on the environment and contributes to climate change. They see the proposed ordinance, alongside the fur …read more
Source:: The Denver Post – Politics
