Within the yammering and debate that unfolded Tuesday afternoon during the College Football Playoff rankings reveal, one utterance should have resonated deeper than all others from Morgantown to Orlando and Tucson to Salt Lake City.
“I think the Big 12’s only getting one team in,” ESPN analyst Greg McElroy said.
That one team, of course, would be the conference champion.
Talk about bad math: There are seven at-large berths available in the 12-team playoff, five weeks remaining and four Big 12 teams in the selection committee’s rankings.
The conference’s fate could not possibly be sealed.
And yet, McElroy’s observation made perfect sense given the placement of Big 12 teams relative to peers from other conference:
— Brigham Young (8-0) has two wins over ranked opponents (SMU and Kansas State), yet the ninth-ranked Cougars are five spots behind Miami (9-0), which has one win over ranked opponents, and four spots behind Texas (7-1), which has zero wins over ranked opponents.
— The Cougars, who have the No. 61 strength-of-schedule, were one spot behind Indiana (9-0), which has the No. 103 schedule and, ahem, no wins over ranked opponents.
— Iowa State (7-1) was No. 17 — behind four SEC teams with two losses. The group includes Mississippi, which lost to Kentucky (3-6). Iowa State’s lone loss is to Texas Tech (6-3).
The Big 12’s poor relative position in the CFP rankings comes despite its placement in the well-regarded Sagarin power ratings — it’s the No. 2 conference, ahead of the Big Ten — and its 2-2 record against the SEC in head-to-head competition.
All of which leads us to wonder if McElroy’s observation is accurate.
If the Big 12’s fate is sealed 31 days before the final rankings are released.
If the pathway to a second bid is blocked.
If the absence of big brand schools in the Big 12 led to a bias against the conference, especially with regard to its only undefeated team, Brigham Young.
An additional piece of evidence suggests that is, in fact, the case.
Of all the metrics deployed by the selection committee, few are more influential than strength-of-record, which compares a team’s record to that of an average Top 25 team facing the same schedule (and is published by ESPN).
The disparity between the Cougars’ strength-of-record and their position in the committee’s rankings is greater than that of any other team in the top 12, and it’s not even close.
Brigham Young’s strength-of-record is No. 4, behind only Georgia, Oregon and Miami.
But the Cougars are No. 9 in the rankings, a difference of five places.
No other team in the top 12 is ranked more than two spots below its strength-of-record position.
No. 4 Miami, No. 8 Indiana and No. 11 Alabama are ranked one spot below their strength-of-record placement, while No. 3 Georgia is two spots below its strength-of-record placement (No. 1).
Meanwhile, No. 10 Notre Dame, which lost to Northern Illinois, is five spots higher in the rankings than its strength-of-record placement.
What do the Irish have that the Cougars don’t? Hmmmm.
To be clear, Brigham Young’s ranking isn’t necessarily a fixed …read more
Source:: The Mercury News – Entertainment
