California has passed dozens of bills in recent years aiming to incentivize new housing, but not all of them have been effective in getting more homes built, as opponents have found workarounds to resist new construction.
This year, the state legislature passed several bills aimed at shoring up the laws already on the books, by providing enforcement mechanisms or closing loopholes that made their implementation unclear.
“No more excuses,” said Gov. Gavin Newsom when he signed a package of 32 new housing bills into effect in September. “These new laws — paired with the state’s unprecedented resources — will deliver more housing, get people off the streets, and provide life-changing support that will benefit all Californians.”
Many of the laws involve one of the oldest housing laws on the books: the Housing Accountability Act, passed in 1982, which tells cities how many housing units they must build every eight years, then requires them to come up with a plan showing how they’ll do that.
SB 1037, passed this year, will allow state officials to impose new fines on cities that fail to greenlight more housing or come up with an approved plan for their future homebuilding goals.
Newsom has threatened to sue cities he accuses of violating housing laws, including Half Moon Bay, whose planning commission slow-walked approvals for a farmworker housing project there. Now, the new rule would hold a new threat over their heads. Any fines levied on cities would go toward an affordable housing fund for that jurisdiction.
Under the Housing Accountability Act, cities without an approved housing plan also fall subject to a provision called the “builder’s remedy” — which allows developers to skirt local zoning codes and propose projects far taller and denser than might typically be allowed — so long as 20% of the units are rented at affordable rates to qualifying tenants.
When several Bay Area cities fell behind on their deadlines to submit a state-approved housing plan in 2022, several developers decided to make use of the little-known tool. Neighbors worried that their low-density towns could be “Manhattanized.” The projects include a three-tower complex at the former Sunset Magazine campus in Menlo Park and a hotel and housing project at the Mountain Winery in the hills behind Saratoga.
But those projects haven’t happened — and, in fact, not a single one of the 98 builder’s remedy projects proposed in the Bay Area has broken ground yet, as cities exploit loopholes in the builder’s remedy provision to prevent the projects from moving forward.
AB 1893, authored by Oakland Democratic Assemblymember Buffy Wicks, closes some of those loopholes and also reins in some of the provisions of the controversial housing statute so that developers can’t build anything that they want while still allowing them to build somewhat denser and taller in cities without an approved housing element.
A second Wicks “cleanup” bill expands her Affordable Housing and High Road Jobs Act of 2022, also known as AB 2011, which allowed by-right construction of multifamily housing on most commercially zoned sites.
And …read more
Source:: The Mercury News – Entertainment
