Culture

Tesla must face autopilot false ad claims by California DMV


By Rachel Graf | Bloomberg

Tesla Inc. failed to persuade an administrative judge to dismiss claims by a California regulator that the company overstated its vehicles’ self-driving capabilities — one of several ongoing regulatory investigations of the electric-car maker’s marketing.

The California Department of Motor Vehicles has alleged that Tesla disseminated false statements about its “Autopilot” and “Full Self-Driving” driver-assistance features, leading customers to believe they are more advanced than they are.

Monday’s ruling comes less than a month after a federal judge in San Francisco ruled that Tesla must face a proposed class-action lawsuit by consumers making similar claims.

While neither ruling addressed the merits of claims against Tesla, they represent a fresh setback for the carmaker just as Chief Executive Officer Elon Musk has staked the company’s future on autonomy.

Musk declared in April that Tesla is “going balls to the wall for autonomy” while committing the car maker to a next-generation, self-driving vehicle concept called the robotaxi. The billionaire entrepreneur has talked a big game about autonomy for over a decade, and has persuaded customers to pay thousands of dollars for its Full Self-Driving, or FSD, feature.

The name is a misnomer — FSD requires constant supervision and doesn’t render vehicles autonomous — but Musk has repeatedly predicted it’s on the verge of measuring up to the branding.

Meanwhile, the company faces federal probes into whether defects in Autopilot have contributed to fatal crashes, as well as investigations by federal prosecutors and the Securities and Exchange Commission into whether Tesla made misleading claims about the feature to the public.

Related Articles

Business |

A man was fired from Fremont’s Tesla factory. Police say he came back, with Molotov cocktails

Business |

A heat wave will cook your electric car battery, if you let it

Business |

Elon Musk accused of improperly selling $7.5 billion in Tesla stock before weak sales report that crashed its price

Business |

Tesla under investigation over Fremont factory toxic emissions, and faces lawsuit over alleged health harms

Business |

A second judge finds Tesla workers at Fremont factory were racially harassed

In the DMV case, Tesla’s attorneys argued at a June 7 hearing that the statements at issue aren’t misleading given numerous disclosures that the features require active supervision from drivers.

Tesla’s lawyers also contended that marketing its vehicles as having full self-driving “capabilities” is not an assertion that the cars are currently fully autonomous, but rather a statement that they will be capable of driving themselves in the future after software updates.

Administrative Law Judge Juliet Cox …read more

Source:: The Mercury News – Entertainment

      

(Visited 7 times, 1 visits today)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *